Why 360 Degree Feedback Falls Short in Evaluating Individual Performance
Why 360 Degree Feedback Falls Short in Evaluating Individual Performance
Why 360 Degree Feedback Falls Short in Evaluating Individual Performance
Why 360 Degree Feedback Falls Short in Evaluating Individual Performance
Why 360 Degree Feedback Falls Short in Evaluating Individual Performance
Why 360 Degree Feedback Falls Short in Evaluating Individual Performance
April 2025
Introduction
360 degree feedback is widely adopted in organisations aiming to gain a comprehensive view of employee performance by collecting input from peers, subordinates, managers, and sometimes clients. While the approach seems holistic, it often introduces more challenges than solutions when assessing individual performance.
Introduction
360 degree feedback is widely adopted in organisations aiming to gain a comprehensive view of employee performance by collecting input from peers, subordinates, managers, and sometimes clients. While the approach seems holistic, it often introduces more challenges than solutions when assessing individual performance.
Perception vs Performance
360 degree feedback captures subjective perceptions rather than objective performance metrics.
Example:
Consider Barry, who receives a 5/5 rating for collaboration from one peer after a successful joint project, but a 2/5 from another who felt excluded from a different initiative. These conflicting views highlight personal experiences rather than Barry's actual performance.
Perception vs Performance
360 degree feedback captures subjective perceptions rather than objective performance metrics.
Example:
Consider Barry, who receives a 5/5 rating for collaboration from one peer after a successful joint project, but a 2/5 from another who felt excluded from a different initiative. These conflicting views highlight personal experiences rather than Barry's actual performance.
Compromising Psychological Safety
Anonymised feedback can lead to a culture of surveillance, where employees focus on managing perceptions instead of improving skills.
Example:
A high performing individual is labeled "abrasive" for seeking clarity in meetings. Consequently, they become less vocal, hindering team effectiveness.
Compromising Psychological Safety
Anonymised feedback can lead to a culture of surveillance, where employees focus on managing perceptions instead of improving skills.
Example:
A high performing individual is labeled "abrasive" for seeking clarity in meetings. Consequently, they become less vocal, hindering team effectiveness.
Amplification of Biases
Instead of mitigating biases, 360 degree feedback can magnify them, especially against marginalised groups.
Example: A 2014 Fortune study analysing real performance reviews found that 76% of women's critical feedback contained comments about personality, such as being “abrasive,” while men were more likely to receive objective, actionable feedback related to skills and outcomes. When you feed that data into a 360 process, the feedback isn't just skewed, it's structurally biased.Snyder, Kieran. “The Abrasiveness Trap: High-Achieving Men and Women Are Described Differently in Reviews.” Fortune, Aug 26, 2014. Link to article
Amplification of Biases
Instead of mitigating biases, 360 degree feedback can magnify them, especially against marginalised groups.
Example: A 2014 Fortune study analysing real performance reviews found that 76% of women's critical feedback contained comments about personality, such as being “abrasive,” while men were more likely to receive objective, actionable feedback related to skills and outcomes. When you feed that data into a 360 process, the feedback isn't just skewed, it's structurally biased.Snyder, Kieran. “The Abrasiveness Trap: High-Achieving Men and Women Are Described Differently in Reviews.” Fortune, Aug 26, 2014. Link to article
Confusion Between Feedback and Performance Management
Merging developmental feedback with performance evaluations leads to ambiguity and misaligned objectives.
Example:
An employee with consistent project success receives mixed 360 feedback, sending a message that subjective opinions outweigh tangible results.
Confusion Between Feedback and Performance Management
Merging developmental feedback with performance evaluations leads to ambiguity and misaligned objectives.
Example:
An employee with consistent project success receives mixed 360 feedback, sending a message that subjective opinions outweigh tangible results.
Excessive Noise, Limited Signal
The volume of feedback from multiple sources can overwhelm managers, making it difficult to extract meaningful insights without context. The opposite is also problematic, too few feedback doesn't offer much insight at all, and you are no closer to understanding performance and impact.
Example:
Managers may resort to interpreting vague comments like "needs more visibility" without understanding the underlying issues.
Excessive Noise, Limited Signal
The volume of feedback from multiple sources can overwhelm managers, making it difficult to extract meaningful insights without context. The opposite is also problematic, too few feedback doesn't offer much insight at all, and you are no closer to understanding performance and impact.
Example:
Managers may resort to interpreting vague comments like "needs more visibility" without understanding the underlying issues.
Incentivising Popularity Over Performance
When peer evaluations influence assessments, employees may prioritise likability over impactful contributions.
Example:
Over collaboration is rewarded, even if it hampers efficiency.
Constructive dissent is penalised as being "difficult."
Quiet high performers are overshadowed by charismatic underperformers. Introvert vs Extrovert conundrum.
Incentivising Popularity Over Performance
When peer evaluations influence assessments, employees may prioritise likability over impactful contributions.
Example:
Over collaboration is rewarded, even if it hampers efficiency.
Constructive dissent is penalised as being "difficult."
Quiet high performers are overshadowed by charismatic underperformers. Introvert vs Extrovert conundrum.
A More Effective Approach: Direct Leadership and Clear Metrics
Establish transparent performance expectations.
Base evaluations on measurable outcomes and observable behaviours.
Foster a culture of continuous, real-time feedback.
Utilise one on one meetings and skip level discussions to understand team dynamics.
Conclusion
While 360 degree feedback aims to provide a rounded view of performance, it often introduces subjectivity and bias, undermining its effectiveness.
I recommend you to focus on direct communication, clear expectations, and objective metrics to truly understand performance.
A More Effective Approach: Direct Leadership and Clear Metrics
Establish transparent performance expectations.
Base evaluations on measurable outcomes and observable behaviours.
Foster a culture of continuous, real-time feedback.
Utilise one on one meetings and skip level discussions to understand team dynamics.
Conclusion
While 360 degree feedback aims to provide a rounded view of performance, it often introduces subjectivity and bias, undermining its effectiveness.
I recommend you to focus on direct communication, clear expectations, and objective metrics to truly understand performance.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Q1: Is 360 degree feedback suitable for performance evaluations?
A: While it offers diverse perspectives, its subjective nature makes it less effective for objective performance assessments.
Q2: What are better alternatives to 360 degree feedback?
A: Regular one on one meetings, discuss clear performance metrics, and continuous feedback mechanisms provide more accurate evaluations.
Q3: Can 360 degree feedback be used effectively in any context?
A: It can be valuable for developmental purposes, such as leadership training, but should be separated from formal performance reviews.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Q1: Is 360 degree feedback suitable for performance evaluations?
A: While it offers diverse perspectives, its subjective nature makes it less effective for objective performance assessments.
Q2: What are better alternatives to 360 degree feedback?
A: Regular one on one meetings, discuss clear performance metrics, and continuous feedback mechanisms provide more accurate evaluations.
Q3: Can 360 degree feedback be used effectively in any context?
A: It can be valuable for developmental purposes, such as leadership training, but should be separated from formal performance reviews.
Related posts
February 2025
Bug Chaos to Confidence: A Multiplayer Release
How to instil confidence and alter the culture towards a quality first mindset. A story about an engineering leader who inherited quality and bug chaos and turned it into a success story.
February 2025
Bug Chaos to Confidence: A Multiplayer Release
How to instil confidence and alter the culture towards a quality first mindset. A story about an engineering leader who inherited quality and bug chaos and turned it into a success story.
February 2025
Bug Chaos to Confidence: A Multiplayer Release
How to instil confidence and alter the culture towards a quality first mindset. A story about an engineering leader who inherited quality and bug chaos and turned it into a success story.